From the daguerreotypes of the 1850s to the contraband photos of the Civil War, these weren’t just photos.
They were evidence of America’s darkest secret, but someone didn’t want you to see them.
What were they hiding and why does it matter now? Renty, African-born enslaved man.
The year was 1850 and in a photography studio in Columbia, South Carolina, something deeply disturbing was taking place.
An elderly African-born enslaved man named Renty, approximately 75 years old, was being stripped naked and photographed, not for any humanitarian purpose, but to advance the pseudo-scientific theories of a Harvard professor named Louis Agassiz.
Renty’s story begins decades earlier, around 1775, in the Congo Basin of Central Africa.
Born into a world rich with diverse ethnic groups and complex social structures, he was captured by slave traders during regional conflicts and transported across the Atlantic in what would become known as the Middle Passage, a horrific voyage marked by disease, overcrowding, and mortality rates that defy comprehension.
He arrived in New Orleans around 1800 aboard a Spanish slave ship, part of the illicit trade that persisted even after the 1808 US ban on importing enslaved Africans.
Purchased by Colonel Thomas Taylor and later owned by his son, Benjamin Franklin Taylor, Renty labored on the Edgehill cotton plantation in Columbia, South Carolina.
Despite laws that made education a punishable offense for enslaved people, Renty demonstrated remarkable determination.
Using a Webster’s blue-back speller, he taught himself to read and shared this knowledge with others, an act of resistance that could have cost him his life.
But it was in March 1850 that Renty would become part of one of the most controversial photographic projects in American history.
Louis Agassiz, a Swiss-born naturalist who had immigrated to the United States in 1846, sought to document supposed racial differences to support polygenism, the now discredited theory that human races were separately created species with implications used to justify slavery.
Working with photographer Joseph T.
Zealy, Agassiz commissioned a series of 15 daguerreotypes of seven enslaved individuals, stripping them partially nude and posing them in front, side, and rear views to emphasize anatomical features.
The daguerreotype of Renty depicts him shirtless, his elderly frame exposed, his direct gaze meeting the camera with a dignity that transcends the dehumanizing circumstances.
While intended to prove black inferiority, the photograph ironically preserves his individuality and challenges viewers with his unwavering stare.
These images were meant to be empirical evidence, lending false credibility to racist ideologies through the supposed objectivity of photography.
Forgotten for over a century, the daguerreotypes were rediscovered in 1976 in an attic cabinet at Harvard’s Peabody Museum by Eleanor Reichlin.
Their re-emergence sparked intense ethical debates about ownership, representation, and reparations.
In 2019, Tamara Lanier, claiming to be Renty’s great-great-great-granddaughter, sued Harvard University, seeking return of the images and damages for their unauthorized use.
Delia, daughter of Renty.
Standing beside her father in that same Columbia, South Carolina photography studio in March 1850 was Delia, a young enslaved woman in her late teens or early 20s, born in the United States to African-born parents.
If Renty’s photograph captured the brutality inflicted upon the first generation of enslaved Africans, Delia’s image illustrated something equally devastating, the generational transmission of bondage, the inheritance of enslavement from parent to child.
Delia was classified as country-born, meaning US-born to African parents.
Her father, Renty, had survived the horrors of the Middle Passage and decades of plantation labor.
Her mother’s identity remains unrecorded, another erasure in the systematic dehumanization of enslaved families.
Delia grew up on the Edgehill plantation, where enslaved people outnumbered whites, cultivating cotton and corn under conditions that stripped away every vestige of human dignity.
[music] When Joseph T.
Zealy captured Delia’s daguerreotype, she was posed nude from the waist up in frontal and profile views.
The label affixed to her image reads, “Delia, country-born, of African parents, daughter of Renty, Congo, plantation of B.
F.
Taylor, Esquimaux, Columbia, SC.
” The process was coercive and degrading.
Subjects were stripped without consent, forced to endure long exposures lasting several minutes, their bodies reduced to scientific specimens in service of racist pseudoscience.
The daguerreotype was part of Louis Agassiz’s effort to provide visual evidence for polygenism, the theory that human races were separate species with Africans deemed inferior.
Yet despite the dehumanizing intent, Delia’s direct gaze in the photograph offers something the commissioners never intended, [music] a glimpse of individual dignity, a silent resistance against the objectification, a humanity that refused to be extinguished.
[music] For Delia, this photograph illustrated the cruel reality of inherited enslavement.
Under laws like the 1662 Virginia statute, children born to enslaved mothers were automatically enslaved, perpetuating bondage across generations.
Plantation records, including probate inventories, confirmed Delia as Renty’s daughter, appearing alongside him in 1850 daguerreotypes and 1852 inventory.
[music] She had at least one sibling, a brother named Renty Thompson, born around 1850, who was sold to another owner in 1860, exemplifying the frequent family disruptions that characterized [music] slavery, parents separated from children, siblings torn apart, families fractured by the slave market’s brutal economics.
After the Civil War, Delia likely adopted the surname [music] Taylor, as many freed people did to reclaim identity, but her life fades from records after 1852 inventories.
Descendants, [music] including Tamara Lanier, have pieced together her lineage through oral histories, ancestry.
com research, and genealogists, fighting to ensure Delia’s humanity is remembered.
Isaac Jefferson, blacksmith.
The daguerreotype taken around 1845 in Petersburg, Virginia presents us with a strikingly different narrative, not of a person still in bondage, but of a formerly enslaved man named Isaac Granger Jefferson, seated in formal attire with a dignified expression holding a hat, his approximately 70-year-old face bearing witness to seven decades of American history.
Born in December 1775 at Monticello, Thomas Jefferson’s Virginia plantation, Isaac was the son of Great George, who would become Monticello’s only enslaved overseer and Ursula Granger, a skilled domestic servant.
As a child, Isaac witnessed pivotal moments of the American Revolution.
He accompanied the Jefferson family during Thomas Jefferson’s governorship and observed Benedict Arnold’s 1781 raid on Richmond, later describing it as seeming like the day of judgment.
But Isaac’s story is defined by more than proximity to a founding father.
As a young man, he was apprenticed in Philadelphia to learn tinsmithing and upon returning to Monticello, he became an accomplished blacksmith and nailer.
In 1796, he demonstrated exceptional skill by forging 507 pounds of nails in 47 days with minimal waste, yielding Thomas Jefferson the highest daily profit of about 85 cents, a testament to his expertise that simultaneously underscored the economic exploitation at slavery’s core.
Around 1796, Isaac married a woman named Iris and they had children including sons Joyce and Squire and daughter Maria.
But the fragility of enslaved family bonds became devastatingly clear.
In 1797, Thomas Jefferson transferred Isaac and his family to his daughter Maria and son-in-law John Wayles Eppes as a wedding [music] gift.
In 1818, Maria was sold to overseer Edmund Bacon for $500, fracturing the family as was tragically common under slavery.
Isaac left Albemarle County around 1822, gaining freedom through means that remain unknown to historians.
By 1824, he met Marquis de Lafayette in Richmond as a free man and he settled in Petersburg, Virginia, where he operated a blacksmith shop.
It was in Petersburg that the daguerreotype was taken, likely by pioneering photographer John Plum Jr.
, capturing Isaac in his retirement years.
What makes Isaac’s story particularly remarkable is his 1847 memoir.
At age 72, he dictated his recollections to Reverend Charles Campbell, titled Life of Isaac Jefferson of Petersburg, Virginia blacksmith.
Rediscovered and published in 1951 as Memoirs of a Monticello slave, the 20-page manuscript provides rare first-hand details about daily life at Monticello, Thomas Jefferson’s routines, and the enslaved communities’ experiences.
[music] In his memoirs, Isaac describes witnessing whippings, noting more whippings than fingers and toes, while also detailing cultural practices like consulting a black healer when his family fell ill, showing how African heritage persisted despite slavery’s attempts at cultural erasure.
Five generations on Smith’s plantation.
In April 1862 in Beaufort, South Carolina, photographer Timothy H.
O’Sullivan captured what would become one of the earliest and largest group portraits of formerly enslaved African Americans, a gathering of over 100 people representing five generations of a family, all born on the same plantation.
The scene unfolds in front of simple wooden slave quarters on J.
J.
Smith’s cotton plantation, shortly after Union forces had liberated the area following the Battle [music] of Port Royal in November 1861.
When Confederate planters fled inland, they abandoned approximately 10,000 enslaved people who were declared contraband of war by Union forces [music] and began the uncertain transition from bondage to freedom.
The photograph shows the assembled group arranged in rows, [music] adults standing or seated, children in the foreground, many dressed in simple clothing like dresses, hats, and shirts.
A central seated man grasps his wrist in a gesture that scholars have interpreted as self-possession, while others hold children or umbrellas, their varied poses creating an image of community amid hardship.
Trees and modest frame houses with gabled roofs and chimneys frame the scene, emphasizing the rural plantation setting that had been home to generations.
What makes this image particularly significant is what it reveals about family bonds under slavery.
The presence of five generations, implying an ancestral lineage dating back to at least the early 1800s, before the 1808 ban on the international slave trade.
The photograph was originally created as a stereograph using the wet plate collodion process, a technique involving glass negatives coated with a light-sensitive emulsion made from gun cotton derived from cotton waste.
[music] The irony is profound.
The very cotton cultivated by enslaved laborers on plantations like Smith’s provided the raw materials for the photographic chemistry used to document their lives.
O’Sullivan, born around 1840 and apprenticed under renowned photographer Mathew Brady, arrived in Port Royal as part of a broader effort to visually record the Union’s Southern campaigns.
The image was exhibited in 1863 at Alexander Gardner’s gallery in Washington, D.
C.
, where it served to inform Northern views on emancipation, providing visual evidence of black families’ resilience and potential for freedom.
Yet, the photograph also reflects the power dynamics of its creation.
The subjects [music] were posed under white photographers’ direction, serving as evidence for humanitarian assessments rather than personal portraits.
Omar ibn Said, enslaved [music] scholar.
The circa 1850 ambrotype of Omar ibn Said presents us with an extraordinary figure, an elderly African Muslim scholar seated in formal attire, wearing a head wrap, holding a cane, his dignified bearing suggesting depths of knowledge and experience that defied every stereotype about enslaved Africans.
Born around 1770 in Futa Toro, a [music] theocratic Islamic state along the Senegal River in what is now Senegal, Omar received 25 years of rigorous Islamic education.
He studied theology, mathematics, astronomy, and Arabic literacy under esteemed teachers, including his brother Sheikh Muhammad Said.
Reflecting the sophisticated intellectual traditions of West African Muslim societies influenced by centers like Timbuktu, [music] in his late 30s, around 1807, Omar’s life shattered when a large army invaded his community during regional conflicts, killing many and capturing survivors for the slave trade.
After enduring the middle passage, a month and a half voyage across the Atlantic, he arrived in Charleston, South Carolina.
Initially purchased by a harsh enslaver named Johnson, whom Omar described as a small, weak, and wicked man and complete infidel with no fear of God, he fled northward.
He sought refuge in a church in Fayetteville, North Carolina, where he prayed, but was discovered and imprisoned for 16 days.
In jail, Omar wrote Arabic inscriptions on the walls, petitions for help that astonished observers unfamiliar with African literacy.
These writings caught attention, and James Owen, prominent North Carolina planter, purchased him.
Under the Owens, Omar experienced [music] relatively better treatment, no beatings, adequate food and clothing.
Though he remained enslaved until his death in the 1860s, [music] what makes Omar’s story extraordinary is his literary legacy.
He authored at least 14 manuscripts in Arabic, demonstrating remarkable cultural retention amid enslavement.
His most famous work is the 1831 autobiography, The Life of Omar ibn Said, commissioned by abolitionist Theodore Dwight and now held by the Library of Congress.
Unlike English-language slave narratives edited by white abolitionists, Omar’s text is unmediated, written entirely in Arabic, beginning with Surah al-Mulk from the Quran to affirm God’s sovereignty.
In his autobiography, Omar writes, “Before I came to the Christian country, my religion was the religion of Muhammad, the apostle of God.
May God have mercy upon him and give him peace.
I walked to the mosque before daybreak, washed my face and head and hands and feet.
I prayed at noon, prayed in the afternoon, prayed at sunset, prayed in the evening.
” These words reveal a man whose faith remained central to his identity despite decades of enslavement in a Christian society.
Omar’s religious practices exemplify what scholars call taqiyya, concealing one’s faith under persecution.
While records claim he was baptized as a Christian in 1820, evidence suggests this was likely superficial, a survival strategy.
His autobiography uses Islamic honorifics for Jesus, “the Messiah, our master,” aligning with Quranic views rather than Christian doctrine.
He wrote dedications to Muhammad in his Arabic Bible and continued writing Quranic verses throughout his life, suggesting he remained Muslim inwardly while outwardly conforming to expectations.
Sweet potato planting on Hopkinson’s plantation.
[music] On April 8th, 1862, on Edisto Island, South Carolina, photographer Henry P.
Moore captured an image that provides rare visual evidence of the transition from slavery to freedom.
A group of African-American men, women, and possibly children engaged in agricultural labor, specifically planting sweet potatoes on what had been Hopkinson’s plantation.
The albumen print shows workers in a plowed field under a tree canopy, some with hoes [music] digging furrows, others kneeling to place sweet potato slips, and horse-drawn carts in the background.
The scene is serene, yet poignant, with subjects dressed in simple clothing, many barefoot, emphasizing the harsh realities of agricultural labor.
The photograph was taken shortly after the Union capture of the Sea Islands in November 1861, following the Battle of Port Royal.
When white planters like James Hopkinson fled inland, they abandoned estates and approximately 10,000 enslaved people who were declared contraband of war by Union forces.
These individuals found themselves in a liminal state, not fully enslaved, but not yet emancipated until the 1863 proclamation.
The image documents a critical aspect of the Port Royal experiment, a pioneering Union initiative where freed people could work abandoned plantations for wages, receive education, and eventually purchase land.
Northern missionaries, abolitionists, and educators arrived to establish schools and hospitals, aiming to demonstrate that freed people could thrive independently.
What makes this photograph particularly significant is its documentation of subsistence farming preferences.
[music] Under slavery, the task labor system on Sea Island plantations allowed enslaved people to complete assigned duties and then use remaining time for personal gardens.
In the Port Royal experiment, freed people continued this practice, prioritizing food crops like sweet potatoes for nutrition and surplus [music] sales over exclusive focus on cash crops like cotton.
This preference stemmed from desires for economic independence, land ownership, and avoidance of exploitative systems reminiscent of slavery.
Sweet potatoes, resilient and nutritious, symbolized this shift.
Easy to grow in the region’s climate and integral to Gullah Geechee diets influenced by African traditions, conflicts arose as freed people interpreted free labor as control over their production, while Northern reformers pushed market-oriented cotton agriculture.
Henry P.
Moore, a New Hampshire photographer who accompanied the Third New Hampshire Regiment to South Carolina in 1862, sought commercial opportunities by documenting soldiers, sailors, and local scenes.
His work on Edisto Island captured the dignity of labor in a region transformed by conflict, though his photographs sometimes reflected paternalistic views of the era.
Union withdrawal from Edisto in June 1862 to support other campaigns disrupted the Port Royal experiment’s efforts, forcing many to relocate to nearby islands.
Two unidentified escaped slaves, contrabands.
The carte de visite captured around 1862 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, shows two unidentified escaped enslaved men in tattered clothing, one seated and one standing.
Their expressions solemn, their attire frayed jackets, patched pants, worn shoes vividly illustrating the physical hardships endured during enslavement and escape.
Photographed by McPherson and Oliver shortly after Union forces occupied Baton Rouge in May 1862, the image documents the influx of escaped enslaved people seeking protection.
These individuals, dubbed contrabands, were not returned to their enslavers under a policy first articulated by General Benjamin Butler, marking an early step toward emancipation.
The photograph bears a handwritten inscription on the verso, “Contrabands just arrived, true to the life.
” Another copy bears the manuscript title “Intelligent Contrabands,” a notation that may have been satirical or descriptive, highlighting how even documentary [music] photographs could carry loaded meanings.
During the Union occupation of Baton Rouge, the city swelled with contrabands filling the town as Confederate [music] refugees fled.
These individuals worked in Union camps as laborers, cooks, and eventually soldiers in units like the Louisiana Native Guards, later the United States Colored Troops.
Contraband camps, often makeshift and over- as recruitment centers for African-American troops and provided initial tastes of freedom.
Though conditions were harsh with disease and limited resources, the contraband policy was formalized through the Confiscation Acts of 1861 and 1862, which allowed Union armies to harbor and employ these individuals, effectively undermining slavery.
By war’s end, over 180,000 African-Americans served in the Union Army, many from Louisiana, accelerating the path to the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and the 13th Amendment in 1865.
Photographers McPherson and Oliver, based in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, adapted to Union occupation by sourcing supplies through military channels.
Their work extended beyond portraits to include battlefield scenes and propaganda imagery, most famously the Scourged Back photo of an enslaved man named Gordon showing severe whipping scars, which was widely circulated by abolitionists.
Auction and Negro Sales, Whitehall Street.
The photograph captured by George N.
Barnard in 1864 during the Union occupation of Atlanta, Georgia, shows a weathered building at 8 Whitehall Street with a prominent sign reading “Auction and Negro Sales.
” The sign, attached to F.
Goiter Brooks’ store selling China and Queensware, advertises the grim business that once thrived there, the buying and selling of human beings.
In the foreground, a solitary Union soldier sits, rifle propped nearby, possibly reading, a detail historians interpret as symbolic of newfound literacy and freedom for African-Americans post-emancipation.
The soldier is likely a member of the United States Colored Troops, and his presence at this site represents a profound irony, a black man in Union uniform guarding a place where enslaved people were once auctioned like livestock.
The photograph was taken during General William T.
Sherman’s Atlanta Campaign, which lasted from May [music] to September 1864.
After intense fighting, Union forces captured the city, and Sherman occupied Atlanta for over 2 months before his infamous March to the Sea.
During this occupation, Barnard, appointed as official photographer for Sherman’s Military Division of the Mississippi, documented the city’s landscapes, fortifications, and social scenes.
Atlanta had been a key railroad and manufacturing hub for the Confederacy, but it also thrived on slavery.
Slave [music] auctions generated city revenue through a $2 tax levied on each sale.
The building at 8 Whitehall Street housed the office for Crawford, Fraser & Co.
, an auction firm that dealt in slaves among other goods.
Prominent auction sites included the area now occupied by the Five Points Marta station, where [music] over 300 auctions are estimated to have occurred.
One of the most infamous events in Georgia’s history was the weeping time in 1859, the largest slave sale in US history held at the Ten Broeck Race Course near Savannah where 436 enslaved people [music] were sold for over $303,000.
While not in Atlanta, this event exemplifies the scale and brutality of the slave trade that permeated southern cities.
Barnard, born in 1819 in Connecticut, had pioneered American photography opening one of the first daguerreotype studios in the US in 1846.
[music] His Civil War work, including this image, appeared in his 1866 album Photographic Views of Sherman’s Campaign offering one of the best visual records of the Western Theater.
Tragically, many of his negatives were destroyed in the fires ignited by Union forces on November 15th, 1864 as they demolished military facilities.
Fires that spread and raised much of the city.
Gordon Peter, Whipped Slave, The Scourged Back.
No photograph from the Civil War era carries more visceral power than The [music] Scourged Back, the 1863 image depicting the extensively scarred back of an escaped enslaved man whose story has become one of the most iconic yet misunderstood narratives of slavery’s brutality.
The subject, primarily identified as Peter, though popularly known as Gordon due to publication errors, was owned by Captain John Lyons who managed a 3,000 acre plantation [music] in St.
Landry Parish, Louisiana.
In late October 1862, Peter endured a brutal whipping by overseer Artayou Carrier that left him bedridden for two months.
>> [music] >> According to Peter’s own statement recorded on the reverse of photocopies, salt brine was rubbed into his wounds, a common torture method to intensify pain and promote scarring.
On March 24th, 1863, Peter escaped under cover of night with three companions, Gordon John, who was killed by pursuers, and an unnamed man.
They traveled stealthily for 10 days covering approximately 40-80 miles rubbing onions and strong scented weeds on their bodies to mask scents from bloodhounds.
After swimming the Amite River twice and navigating swamps barefoot, Peter reached Union lines in Baton Rouge on April 2nd, 1863.
[music] At the Provost Marshal’s office, Peter gave a statement in broken English and French describing his ordeal.
During a routine medical examination for Union enlistment, photographers William D.
McPherson and J.
Oliver documented his scars.
The resulting carte de visite shows Peter seated sideways, [music] shirtless, his back to the camera revealing a web of raised keloid scars from buttocks to shoulders.
Three variants exist with slight pose adjustments suggesting multiple takes to maximize the image’s impact.
Union surgeons like Samuel K.
Towl and J.
W.
Mercer attested to the scars’ authenticity noting similar injuries were common among examined contrabands.
The photograph was distributed widely in northern cities, duplicated by printers such as Mathew [music] Brady, and sold to fund abolitionist causes.
On July 4th, 1863, Harper’s Weekly published a wood engraving in A Typical Negro reaching [music] a massive audience.
The article declared the image a wordless indictment of slavery [music] and abolitionists like Theodore Tilton urged its multiplication by 100,000 copies.
It featured in Fanny Ann Kemble’s 1863 memoir and was decried as fabricated by pro-slavery copperheads prompting defenses from Union witnesses.
The photograph’s historical significance [music] is immense.
It humanized enslaved people, countered dehumanizing narratives, and boosted black enlistment in the Union Army.
Historians note its role in before and after emancipation stories.
[music] Though it relied on white intermediaries rather than amplifying black voices directly, there’s been significant confusion about Peter’s identity.
For over 150 years, the subject was conflated with another escaped slave named Gordon who fled with him.
Harper’s Weekly’s [music] 1863 article created a fictional composite character by combining Peter’s scarred back with Gordon’s arrival photo and an unrelated uniformed soldier adding embellishments for dramatic effect.
Scholars like David Silkenat have since clarified the distinction through [music] primary sources.
In September 2025, The Scourged Back became embroiled in contemporary politics.
Reports emerged that the Trump administration ordered its removal from national parks like Fort Pulaski National Monument citing a push against divisive content.
This sparked outrage from historians and activists viewing it as whitewashing [music] history with Louisiana representatives like Rep.
Troy Carter opposing the move.
The image inspired the 2022 film Emancipation loosely based on Peter’s escape and starring Will Smith.
It continues to appear in protests, educational materials, and museum exhibits held in collections including the National Portrait Gallery, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Library of Congress, and Smithsonian.
Enslaved Woman Holding White Child.
The ruby ambrotype from around 1855 depicts an unidentified enslaved African American woman serving as a nursemaid to a white child.
The hand-colored photograph on red-tinted glass shows a seated woman in simple attire holding a white infant on her lap, her face partially obscured in the composition to emphasize the child.
This sixth-plate image measuring approximately 2.
75 x 3.
25 inches and housed in a decorative case with velvet lining includes hand-tinted elements like pink cheeks and gold jewelry typical of mid-19th century portraiture.
The woman’s posture and gaze reflect the power dynamics of the era where enslaved subjects were posed to serve white narratives.
The photograph originated from Arkansas’s Delta region based on estate sale notes likely from towns like Helena, West Memphis, or Pine Bluff.
Arkansas, admitted as a slave state in 1836, saw rapid growth in enslaved labor for cotton production where families faced constant threats of auctions that fractured black kinship networks.
The image exemplifies what scholars called chattel madonna imagery, photographs that romanticized exploitation by portraying enslaved women as devoted caregivers to white children while masking the coercive realities of their lives.
Enslaved women in domestic roles occupied a higher status relative to field laborers, yet this was illusory marked by constant surveillance, emotional demands, and separation from their own kin.
In the antebellum south, household enslaved people were integral to white family life often nursing and raising children while enduring the psychological toll of forced intimacy.
[music] This dynamic perpetuated stereotypes of black women as self-sacrificing mammies devoid of personal desires or families.
Enslaved women’s reproductive labor was commodified.
They birthed children who became property often while wet nursing white infants at the expense of their own.
The ruby ambrotype process involving silver nitrate on red glass for a positive image was a mid-19th century innovation that made portraits more affordable than daguerreotypes but still largely inaccessible to enslaved individuals.
Early photography of enslaved people was rare estimated at fewer than 100 surviving images from before 1865 due to cost and enslavers’ monopoly on the medium.
Similar images survive in collections like the National Museum of African American History and Culture depicting young women holding white children often hand-tinted with gold jewelry or pink cheeks.
These artifacts challenge viewers to confront slavery’s legacies including how black women’s labor sustained white society while denying their humanity.
African American Boys Labeled Intelligent Contraband.
Captured around 1863 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, the photograph labeled Intelligent Contraband depicts two young escaped African American boys who sought refuge with Union forces during the Civil War.
The carte de visite shows the figures in ragged clothing, one barefoot, posed in a makeshift studio with a hanging sheet backdrop and bare ground.
By labeling the boys intelligent, the photo directly countered 19th century racist [music] tropes portraying African Americans as inherently inferior showcasing their resilience and strategic pursuit of freedom.
The manuscript title may have been added satirically or descriptively by period viewers, but it underscores the subjects’ awareness and determination in navigating [music] perilous escapes.
Photographers William D.
McPherson and Oliver, operating in occupied Louisiana, captured this as part of a series documenting escaped slaves.
During the Union occupation of Baton Rouge starting in 1862, thousands of enslaved people fled to federal lines where they were deemed contraband of war under General Benjamin Butler’s policy.
The photograph illustrates how such individuals contributed to Union efforts through labor and eventual enlistment challenging [music] southern which exposed physical abuses.
Some sources describe the subjects as young men rather than boys reflecting period-specific language ambiguities that often infantilized African American males.
Their identities remain anonymous, but the image captures both [music] the physical toll of enslavement and flight.
Ragged attire symbolizing hardship yet composed poses conveying dignity.
An adjacent image in historical collections shows a 12-year-old boy who traveled [music] 600 miles through swamps to fight for freedom reinforcing themes of endurance and purpose.
During the Civil War, such photographs were disseminated as cartes de visite to influence public opinion and support recruitment into the United [music] States Colored Troops where by late 1863 over 37,000 African Americans had enlisted.
[music] Click on one of the cards on your screen to see more videos like this.
